| – | the meaningful amount of the investment
|
|
| – | the final lessee was in essence a start up with meaningless financial capacities and strong seasonal cash flow movements
|
|
| – | the risk evaluation related to the lessee and the object to be financed to be considered unusual for the leasing market
|
|
| – | the missing involvement of the parent company as direct guarantor due to the specific shareholder structure of the group and lessee
|
|
| – | the signature of a pre-financing agreement in order to support financial needs during the long working progress of the equipment
|
|
| – | the supplier was located in Switzerland (non CEE country) and was paid in Swiss Francs
|
|
| – | the timing of the deal was a crucial issue as the dead line of the delivery could not be delayed for whatever reason after the seasonal opening of the amusement park
|
|
| – | the technical features and nature of the object in terms of all applicable rules for importation, environmental and logistic issues, applicable tax & duties, local laws and authorizations for instalment, ownerships liabilities, insurances coverage, etc.
|
|
After a series of meetings with the supplier and the German and Italian management of the lessee around Europe (speaking different languages), we offered a comprehensive package to finance the equipment which was successfully installed within the forecasted dead line.